annotated bibliography

Walter, T. (1996) A New Model of Grief: Bereavement & Biography. Mortality Vol 1(1): 7-25.

 

Tony Walter introduces a model of bereavement based upon his own personal experiences. He positions this model in opposition to what he deems the 'dominant model' (Walter 1996: 7), which encourages a 'working through and resolution of feelings' (Walter 1996: 7), with the purpose of detachment. Walter's process however advocates talking about the deceased, preferably with others who knew them, in order to 'find an appropriate place for the dead in one's life' (Worden in Walter 1996: 12).

 

As the study group consists of one person, the findings cannot reasonably be applied to the wider public. This is not necessarily a problem if the paper simply lays groundwork for a future objective study and Walter does acknowledge the need for wider research (1996: 20). Subjectivity again proves problematic in the notion of a 'competing discourse' (Walter 1996: 21), which Walter's argument revolves around. Given his emotional involvement, the author may have a heightened sense of his own grief and a feeling that his bereavement cases are special. His proposed model is arguably not at stark odds with common practice and again, he recognises this indirectly, stating, 'the model I am proposing may supplement, rather than replace, the conventional wisdom' (Walter 1996: 20). The article itself comes across as a working through of the author's feelings; his grieving process appears to have led him towards detachment from his more intimate links with the deceased's living identity. Despite the subjective lens, the article raises many important general points about such issues as the benefit of open discussion, the effects of migration and longevity on social connection, and the need to recognise various different modes of grieving.

.

Corr, C. A. (2016) Four Lessons From “The Horse on the Dining-Room Table”. OMEGA: Journal of Death & Dying, 73, (3), 250-262. Available at: http://content.ebscohost.com/ContentServer.asp?EbscoContent=dGJyMMTo50SeprU4zdnyOLCmr06ep7NSs6%2B4S66WxWXS&ContentCustomer=dGJyMPGqtk63rrJMuePfgeyx43zx1d%2BI5wAA&T=P&P=AN&S=R&D=sih&K=116490342 [Accessed 25 September 2016].

 

The article features a critical analysis of the short, allegorical work of fiction The Horse on the Dining-Room Table by Richard A. Kalish (1981). Corr separates the story into three parts, highlighting the three points addressed by Kalish regarding a lack of open communication about death. Corr reflects upon the general gap in understanding between the healthy and the dying, the empirical problem of acknowledging death in the presence of a dying individual, and Kalish's proposed alternative to avoidance. Comparing Kalish's text to the poem There's an Elephant in the Room by Terry Kettering (2006), Corr (2016: 259) states that 'the Kalish story is superior', due to its relative constructiveness.

.
1 2